Referencing Styles : APA ObjectivesThis assignment is designed to encourage the development of ability to apply a systematic approachin a digital investigation through the conduct of computer forensics procedures and the use ofcomputer forensics tools, and to encourage the ability to identify the legal issues involved in acomputer forensic investigation across jurisdictions. Please refer to the unit profile to see how thisassessment item relates to the unit learning outcomes.These objectives will be measured by the &lsq … View More Objectives This assignment is designed to encourage the development of ability to apply a systematic approach in a digital investigation through the conduct of computer forensics procedures and the use of computer forensics tools, and to encourage the ability to identify the legal issues involved in a computer forensic investigation across jurisdictions. Please refer to the unit profile to see how this assessment item relates to the unit learning outcomes. These objectives will be measured by the ‘closeness of fit’ to meeting the requirements and the assessment criteria below. General Assessment Criteria Incomprehensible submissions. Assessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills to achieve the required standard. To do this, assessment responses need to be both clear and easy to understand. If not, the University cannot determine that students have demonstrated their knowledge and skills. Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordingly including the potential for 0 (zero) marks where relevant. Late penalty. Late submissions will attract penalties at 5% for each calendar day or part thereof that it is late of the total available mark for the individual assessment item. This means that, for an assessment worth 35 marks, the mark that you earn is reduced by 1.75 marks each calendar day that the assessment is late (including part-days and weekends). See s4.58 in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework). Check with marking criteria. Before submitting your assignment you should check it against the assessment criteria included in this specification to ensure that you have satisfactorily addressed all the criteria that will be used to mark your assignment. Academic language. All submissions should be thoroughly proof-read for spelling, typographical or grammatical errors before being submitted. Do not reply on the ‘spell-check’ function in your word processing program. If, for example, ‘affect’ is substituted for ‘effect’, your program may not detect the error. Academic Integrity All assignments will be checked for plagiarism (material copied from other students and/or material copied from other sources) using TurnItIn (TII). If you are found to have plagiarised material or if you have used someone else’s words without appropriate referencing, you will be penalised for plagiarism Due date: 23:45:00 AEST Week 7 Friday (01/09/2016) ASSESSMENT Weighting: 35% Length: In-class presentation (20 minutes, on-campus student 2 only), 2,000 words report with references. !1 which could result in zero marks for the whole assignment. In some circumstances a more severe penalty may be imposed. The link to the University’s Academic Misconduct Procedures is available in the unit profile. Read Less